Explaining Open Standards email attachements
Hugo Roy
hugo at fsfe.org
Mon Apr 5 16:35:32 UTC 2010
Le lundi 05 avril 2010 à 17:28 +0100, David Gerard a écrit :
>
> Er ... that's a political document.
>
Last time I checked, political involves "power" and social control.
Here, it is just about: if you use Open Standards, it works. If you use
something else, it's wrong because you cannot be sure it works, which is
a pity when you are communicating.
This one is political:
http://www.fsf.org/news/why-im-rejecting-your-email-attachment
I am sure you see the difference ;)
Best,
--
Hugo Roy im: hugo at jabber.fsfe.org
French Coordinator http://www.fsfe.org/about/roy
Free Software Foundation Europe works to create general understanding
and support for software freedom in politics, law and society-at-large.
For more information, see http://www.fsfe.org
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 316 bytes
Desc: Ceci est une partie de message numériquement signée
URL: <http://lists.fsfe.org/pipermail/discussion/attachments/20100405/c2cab60c/attachment.sig>
More information about the Discussion
mailing list