From alex@conostix.com Mon May 27 10:28:20 2002
The sourcecode definitely has now been published so it is covered by the GPL. For this reason, the author grants royalty free use by anybody. He cannot earn money from this idea.
BTW: Red Hat in general is not very GPL friendly...
Are you sure of that ? I think RedHat is one of the only GNU/Linux vendor that take into account the GNU General Public License. Every part of code done by RedHat seems to be under the GNU General Publice License. (from the installer to the tmpwatch command ;-)
Let us call it this way:
They are definitely _not_ _going_ the Open Source / Free Software way:
- They are Open Source -> Yes
- The software they create benefits from OSS/FS development paradigms -> NO
The main improvements with OSS/FS is (intended to be) the fact that other OSS/FS development efforts can/will be used to enhance a specific program.
If RH insists in not integrating other OSS/FS parts, they are definitely not a OSS/FS company but only just another company that makes Source available.
Jörg
EMail:joerg@schily.isdn.cs.tu-berlin.de (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin js@cs.tu-berlin.de (uni) If you don't have iso-8859-1 schilling@fokus.gmd.de (work) chars I am J"org Schilling URL: http://www.fokus.gmd.de/usr/schilling ftp://ftp.fokus.gmd.de/pub/unix