Are you suggesting that i am abusing you by pointing out that the results of an election with only one candidate are a foregone conclusion?

On 18 April 2016 at 09:13, Repentinus <repentinus@fsfe.org> wrote:
On 04/18/2016 01:07 PM, Joe Awni wrote:
> If you have not had time to read the message, how do you find time to
> reply at length?

Nowhere in his public e-mail has Erik stated that he has not had enough
time to read your message.

> Just because you made rules, at a previous date, regarding the structure
> of the election does not mean you have to waste this election which has
> only one candidate.
> *Indeed, its the purpose of the election to let the people decide. *

I explained the purpose of the Fellowship elections to you in my e-mail
to the list.

> If you insist on not allowing write-ins, I'll call the election and you
> can just go home.

This kind of abuse will not be tolerated.


--
Heiki Lõhmus
Coordinator Translations
Free Software Foundation Europe
mailto:repentinus@fsfe.org
xmpp:repentinus@jabber.fsfe.org
http://blogs.fsfe.org/repentinus/


_______________________________________________
Discussion mailing list
Discussion@fsfeurope.org
https://mail.fsfeurope.org/mailman/listinfo/discussion