A small correction/mea culpa:
Matthias has (and thanks! :) )pointed me to this Mastodon post:
https://social.anoxinon.de/@bruno/105854405626581664
It provides some links showing that there's in fact an official between Fairphone and the /e/ OS, and that the /e/ foundation is selling Fairphones with /e/ pre-installed.
So that's great news! It may in fact be an important step for Free Software on Android. Also, I did not know that when I wrote my post.
But, here's the thing which I still think they could improve: I read the description on their own web page quite closely. I might have done more research, but I'd have liked to see the free OS as an option on the shop page - I wouldn't mind if the option came with a warning against the missing Google apps, but it would be nice if that option were included as just one more way to get this fairer phone.
Best,
Carsten
I just bought a new Fairphone 3, and the experience inspired me to write the following on their official forum. I think I was called to do this mainly because I really like th project and think it's a shame they focus so little on free software, now they've apparently got so many other things right.
"I just received my FP3, and it’s a lovely device, following suit on FP1 and FP2, both of which I’ve owned (the FP1 is bricked, the FP2 reboots randomly and needs a new mike - I suppose the mike could be fixed, but I dont know abt the restarts).
Anyway, I really like the device and the work Fairphone is doing for a fairer production cycle and a fairer product in terms of repairability.
However, in one respect I believe the phone is not fair: It comes preloaded with Google’s Android including the full Google Apps suite - i.e., with a proprietary OS and a set of proprietary and very surveillance-heavy apps. Negatively, one might say it by default comes loaded with spyware. I don’t get how that is fair. As a long-standing free software activist and current member of the General Assembly of Free Software Foundation Europe (talking here, though, solely in my private capacity) I think that “fair” software is free - as in freedom, i.e. with all source code available.
On the other hand, I get that many users want the comfort and efficiency in the Google App suite. The FP1 came with only free software from the AOSP project and a link to install Google Apps. I thought that was fair.
Alternatively, you - Fairphone the organization - could sell FP3s preloaded with LineageOS or Sailfish OS or one of the other Google-free alternatives.
I do realize that I can install one of those on the phone myself and will probably also end up doing so. But honestly, I don’t think it is reasonable by the standards of a project that declares itelf to be the fair phone - to put it like that, I don’t think it is FAIR - that the general, non-tech-savvy public can’t buy a fair and ethical phone that doesn’t by default opt them in to Google’s global surveillance circus.
All the best and congratulations with all the cool things in the project,
Carsten"
_______________________________________________ Discussion mailing list Discussion@lists.fsfe.org https://lists.fsfe.org/mailman/listinfo/discussion This mailing list is covered by the FSFE's Code of Conduct. All participants are kindly asked to be excellent to each other: https://fsfe.org/about/codeofconduct