On Mon, Jun 12, 2006 at 08:07:13PM +0100, Sam Liddicott wrote:
To unite both types; I suggest "levels" or "types" of membership, those
that have achieved the strictest aims of the organisation and those that
are working towards it. In some cases those "working towards" may be
working against internal momentum, the state of the market, or just
idling. A check on the number of members in the same software sector
with "purer" membership will differentiate
between those who find FSF virtues a matter of commercial expedience and
those struggling against a real lack of choice.
I don't see how several (types or) levels will provide an incentive to
reach a higher level.