If I'm not mistaken, this is already there.
They are freedoms, not obligations against the user. They must be possoble of course, but the user isn't obligated to make use of all of the freedoms, the same applies to freedom 0, see [1].
[1] http://dcc.ufmg.br/~lcerf/rms.webm. This is multi-audio-track file. First is with speech in English and commentaries unchanged (either in English or in Brazilian Portuguese); second is with speech translated to Brazilian Portuguese (it has some minor errors and cuts but it's OK for the majority of the speech).
2017-11-29T12:21:54+0100 Andrea Trentini wrote:
(a latere, semi-serious)
May I propose an amendment to the first freedom (as in https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/free-sw.html)?
"The freedom to run the program as you wish, for any purpose (freedom 0)."
should become
"The freedom to run (or NOT to run) the program as you wish, for any purpose (freedom 0)."
Of course it's redundant, but it emphasizes the liberty to opt-out.