On Wed, 8 Aug 2001 09:39:03 +0200, Alessandro Rubini said:
To my knoledge, a work is told to be in the public domain when the exclusive rights of the author (copy rights) have expired. What you
True, 70 years after the death of the author it is a public good but for practial usage you have to find a copy which has been published
70 years ago.
can't give up is the "moral" right of being the author, but that has little practical meaning, as far as I can tell.
The only problem is that some U.S. authors say: "I put this into the public domain" - this is not sufficient because this term is only useful under U.S. copyright law and afaik not part of the Bern Convention.
Instead of putting something into the "public domain" an author should give explicit permission like:
# Copyright (C) 2001 Joe Random Hacker # # This file is free software; as a special exception the author gives # unlimited permission to copy and/or distribute it, with or without # modifications, as long as this notice is preserved. # # This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, but # WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY, to the extent permitted by law; without even the # implied warranty of MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
so that it can be used outside the U.S. without problems. The drawback is that the copyright notice has to be put into all derived works - but that is something a responsible hacker always does - it is needed to keep track of the changes and the legal status of a work.
Ciao,
Werner
#include <ianal.h>