"Shane M. Coughlan" shane@shaneland.co.uk
[...] It may also open the GBN to criticism as an 'extremist' network with a hidden agenda. In other words, such a list could be used by critical parties to formulate charges against the GBN.
It could, but would that be seen as reasonable, or leave the accusers open to criticism as an extremist organisation with a hidden agenda of disrupting their customers? We can look at other organisations that carry out both positive and negative labelling, such as the Plain English Campaign, which were able to overcome the early criticism of their efforts, and copy their tactics when needed.
Hope that helps,