On Tue, 30 Jan 2007 14:47, neal@walfield.org said:
common feeling. I call this assertion into question: Maemo relies heavily on non-free components and Nokia has constructed technical and psychological barriers which prevent a free platform from emerging. I
I talked at the LinuxTag 2005 with Devesh Kothari, Nokia's product manager for "OSS", who is more a techie than a suit. He assured me that the use of Opera is only a temporary solution and that they are already working on a replacing it using a free browser (Konquerer). I have still not seen any movement in this regard. AFAIK, even the promised Vorbis support using the DSP has still not been implemented.
At one point I was about to get into DSP hacking to make the 770 a more useful audoi device (in terms of battery life). However, noticing that with the n800 nothing went for the better, I doubt that it makes sense to spend time on hardware which is more ore less obsolete now. So my device will rest in my living room as a Wikipedia browser.
BTW, it is not only Nokia. Other vendors operate the same way. For instance, Hauppage's MVP box: Many people spent a lot of time improving the devices but at one point you are trapped the same way as when working on Windows. In that case the driver for the MPEG decoder and video device of the PowerPC chip. IBM, that huge free software supporter won't release any specs.
Maybe these vendors are part of a greater plan: Embrace the hackers and let them spend their time on cool para-free gadgets so that they can't work on free code ;-)
Shalom-Salam,
Werner