On Mon, Jun 12, 2006 at 08:07:13PM +0100, Sam Liddicott wrote:
To unite both types; I suggest "levels" or "types" of membership, those that have achieved the strictest aims of the organisation and those that are working towards it. In some cases those "working towards" may be working against internal momentum, the state of the market, or just idling. A check on the number of members in the same software sector with "purer" membership will differentiate between those who find FSF virtues a matter of commercial expedience and those struggling against a real lack of choice.
I don't see how several (types or) levels will provide an incentive to reach a higher level.