On Thu, Jul 19, 2007 at 12:59:11AM +0300, Yavor Doganov wrote:
Oleg Verych wrote:
[just a note]
And just a sidenote: pay attention to the mailing list you're sending this to. Most of the list subscribers are well aware about these issues and presumably have already oriented themselves.
Thank you for the clarification. Nevertheless somebody seems doesn't see the difference unfortunately...
On Wed, Jul 18, 2007 at 09:25:22PM +0100, Alex Hudson wrote:
First, free software is very good at being decentralised: git,
What do mean `git'? GNU Interactive Tools or that one authored by Linus Torvalds? Latter isn't free software it's open source.
It is free software because the author(s) chose a license that is a free software license. The views of the authors regarding the free software movement and its goals are irrelevant. However, namely these antagonistic views are a reason (valid or not) for some people, including myself, not to use their software when viable alternaives exist. This is also irrelevant to the issue -- git (the VCS) is free software regardless.
Whatever. Really. I've subscribed here due to closed archives. Now i see why i should leave.
| I don't call Linux "Free Software". I haven't called it that for close to | ten years! Because I think the term "Open Source" is a lot better. `--alpine.LFD.0.98.0706141153550.14121@woody.linux-foundation.org--
If you care to prove your talk, please see more: alpine.LFD.0.98.0706181344080.3593@... alpine.LFD.0.98.0706141402400.14121@...
Talking is most easiest part of all that thing...
Goodbye and sorry for my bad English. ____