Jan-Oliver Wagner jan@intevation.de wrote:
My personal opinion is that if the web pages did not change, also the corporate culture did not adopt the term Free Software nor understand the problem of the other term.
On a saddening point, an open source promoter with EC involvement was at a meeting I was at recently, yet he promoted StarOffice as an "open source" alternative. I'm rather confused by this. I am right in thinking that it is restrictively licensed, am I not? It looks it to me, but am I going mad?
(If that person is reading this list now, "hi".)