* Alfred M. Szmidt wrote, On 26/09/06 22:41:
I should have been more clear, I was trying to avoid being rude to ams.
I fail to see where you were rude to me in anyway.
It was a truncation of a longer response where I was saying that ams should not have kept out of politics.
I meant that the participation methods of FSF act as a selector of participants thus rendering ams conclusion meaningless, and supporting you.
Sorry not to have been clear enough.
I wasn't confused before, but now I am, I don't understand the two above sentences at all.
So now to clear things up, I say what I intended not to say. (Reply accidentally sent seperately in response to original message)
Sam