On Wed, 2002-05-29 at 20:32, Jan Wildeboer wrote:
Werner Koch wrote:
Jan asked why GPL compatible licenses are not included.
It was meant like this: Say I have programmed something and that is distributed under a GPL-compatible license. Now I want to add some routines that touch these patents. According to RedHats statement I am not allowed to do this undr the terms of their promise as my license is not the GPL but only GPL-compatible. Am I right?
If it is a GPL compatible license not listed under RedHat's 'promise', then I think it's unfourtunately so.
sadly, rui