MJ Ray wrote:
However, FSF have fallen into a trap of licence-gazing and have published the terrible AfferoGPLv3. AGPLv3 is hazardous to charities and cooperatives - even if the lawyerbombs resolve in the best possible ways, it pushes up costs of these marginal providers because of the sins of Big-Webmail-like providers.
Hazardous? I'd love to know how.
This is especially ironic given the increasing use of proprietary webapps by FSF projects. I fear FSFE would not dare to criticise FSF's Affero-advocacy, so could not be relied upon to identify non-trap providers reliably.
Which of the following FSF projects?
* GNU Project * Defective by Design * Bad Vista * End Software Patents * OpenDocument Campaign * ACTA * High priority projects * Free Software Directory
I'm aware, as you are, of one single piece of GNU software (Mailman) using a non-free bug tracker/wiki on their own site, plus I'm sure bazaar uses Launchpad.