On 19-Nov-2007, Ciaran O'Riordan wrote:
Sean Daly's interviewed the director of the BBC's division responsible for their DRM'd iPlayer software:
Thanks for drawing my attention to this, it's highly relevant and a good interview by Sean asking the key questinos in a way designed to get information.
Among that information was:
[...] all the broadcasters, public-service broadcasters in the UK, are able to offer their television programs for a period of time free over the Internet.
And the way we've done that is by managing to assure the rights holders that their content will not easily be distributed beyond the UK where they have very important and for them, lucrative secondary rights windows. Now, that has required us to demonstrate a robust use of digital rights management. That's where we are.
This is good to see come out, because it highlights exactly why DRM is hostile to the users. Assurance "that their content will not easily be distributed beyond the UK"?
To the extent that assurance is true, it's exactly the kind of user-hostile restriction that encourages users to seek more user-friendly distribution systems — even ones that violate copyright, because clearly current copyright restrictions are not serving them.
I think this is interesting at the European level because the issues faced by the UK's BBC will surely be faced by other countries in the next few years.
Yes. Will every country in the EU have assurances to media hoarders "that their content will not easily be distributed beyond" that country?
Or will they acknowledge that their users actually *do* move internationally, especially in Europe, and that users expect the internet to do what it does best and move those bits around with them seamlessly?