On Sat, 2006-09-23 at 17:41 +0200, Andreas K. Foerster wrote:
Am Freitag, dem 22. Sep 2006 schrieb Stefano Spinucci:
What do you think about it ???
This paper was the result, when Linus Torvalds made a survey amongst the most active kernel-hackers... I think, the outcome is no surprise, when a prominent opponent of the GPLv3 asks a very limited number of his strongest followers for their opinion. ;-\
I found this blog is a very good answer: http://tieguy.org/blog/2006/09/22/what-the-kernel-guys-got-wrong/
Nice, yes. Also note how biased is the poll they did:
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/448853/focus=448853
Look at the -3 vote rationale (also == to 3 ??): I wouldn't want to use v3 (I really dislike it, or my company would have serious problems allowing me to participate using the v3 draft)
If companies will is more important than kernel freedom, then why keeping GPLv2 in first stance? If you asked major companies 10 years ago if they were willing to let their engineers to contribute code under the GPLv2 what would have the answer been? (A clear and sound: "are you crazy?" IMO)
Simo.