"Andrés G. Aragoneses" aaragoneses@novell.com writes:
I think it makes more sense for them to embrace a common license, and much better if it's blessed by the FSF, instead of each one adopting a very similar one.
Well, I'm not going to tell anyone not to discuss or ask questions. But I think your chances of getting a new license “blessed by the FSF” are vanishingly small.
These companies that want license terms already had the opportunity to get a blessed-by-the-FSF license: the GPLv3, which was the result of unprecedented input and discussion from the entire software community. I would expect you will have better results encouraging companies to use those well-understood license terms.