Without intended to promote dissent, I like UEFI with secure boot when I can upload the signing keys and there is a physical switch on such key storage. That way I can secure my own machine and retain my own freedom.
I acknowledge that UEFI + secure boot generally refers to something more restrictive
On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 3:20 PM, Tanguy Ortolo tanguy+fsfe@ortolo.euwrote:
Hugo Roy, 2013-01-18 15:59+0100:
Le vendredi 18 janvier 2013 à 09:16 -0500, simo a écrit :
What's wrong with UEFI ?
Thank you Simo for pointing it out. What's usually wrong with UEFI (the replacement for BIOS) is the "Secure Boot" feature. Matthias published an analysis on fsfe.org:
http://fsfe.org/campaigns/generalpurposecomputing/secure-boot-analysis.en.ht...
But note that there are computers with an UEFI and no Secure Boot.
-- Tanguy
Discussion mailing list Discussion@fsfeurope.org https://mail.fsfeurope.org/mailman/listinfo/discussion