On Sun, May 05, 2002 at 12:40:40AM +0200, Jeroen Dekkers wrote:
On Sat, May 04, 2002 at 11:33:46PM +0200, Tomasz Wegrzanowski wrote:
No, it's not. DFSG is perfect, it's GFDL what is flawed.
No, the first flaw of the DFSG is that it only goes about software and not about documentation.
There was always lot of documentation in Debian. If FSF didn't introduce completely broken GFDL, it would all be alright.
GFDL with "invariant sections" or some "front/back cover" things is proprietary license.
It isn't, it only takes away freedoms you can't do anything useful
Not having to publish crap is something very useful.
with and is generally only abused. The same does the GPL.
Have you ever worked with open/free documentation ?
It would completely destroy Wikipedia if we allowed some 'invariant sections'.