Seeing as fsfeurope.org redirects to fsfe.org, I don't think the brand is being weakened. "FSFE" would seem to be the leading acronym, with "FSF Europe" maybe used at times to show stronger affiliation as "a European branch of the FSF". Not having reviewed any charters, though, I can't be sure how accurate the real situation is or should be.
Compare: - "FSFE initiated talks with Danish MEPs." -> An org called FSFE is talking with MEPs in Denmark. - "FSF Europe initiated talks with Danish MEPs." -> The FSF is talking with Danish MEPs through it's EU office.
A primary acronym should be official, but a balanced "E vs Europe" mix can be useful in raise public awareness depending on context.
On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 12:03 PM, MJ Ray mjr@phonecoop.coop wrote:
Matthias Kirschner mk@fsfe.org
For the background: fsfeurope.org was used at the beginning. Than we registered fsfe.org. We used that as a short sexy domain for the Fellowship, when we started it in 2004. Than we changed our outside communication from "FSF Europe" to FSFE. [...]
I feel that was a backwards step because "FSF" and "FSF Europe" reinforced each others names and some technical audiences already knew FSF. FSFE is just another non-intuitive ETLA which has to be expanded more often.
But if you go ahead with fsfe.org as a primary, please keep the List-Id values the same on the mailing lists. I think that might require fixing an old bug in Mailman, to make List-Id configurable and independent of the email domain, but it would be good to fix that at last.
Hope that informs,
MJ Ray (slef), member of www.software.coop, a for-more-than-profit co-op. http://koha-community.org supporter, web and library systems developer. In My Opinion Only: see http://mjr.towers.org.uk/email.html Available for hire (including development) at http://www.software.coop/ _______________________________________________ Discussion mailing list Discussion@fsfeurope.org https://mail.fsfeurope.org/mailman/listinfo/discussion