Hello!
Am Freitag, 8. April 2016 12:08:34 schrieb Matthias Kirschner:
From all we heard it is very helpful if you spent a few minutes and submit your ideas.
http://k7r.eu/urgent-help-until-10-april-to-influence-how-750-millions-will-...
I had about 45 Minutes to phrase my reply, I still hope it is useful.
Best, Bernhard ps.: resend because my first attempt did not seem to have made it.
== Details, of BER's submission to https://ec.europa.eu/eusurvey/runner/nextgen-internet
== Your occupation and expertise
Entrepreneur, Company owner for Security and complex applications. Academic grades: Dipl. Applied System Scientist (University of Osnabrück, DE), MSc. Geographie (University of Milwaukee, US) More Details: http://intevation.de/~bernhard/index.en.html
== Status of the Internet in 2016 The internet is an important backbone of society and overall humanity.
Net Neutrality is very important because only competition will enable smaller companies to be innovative and this is what Net Neutrality is about. There is a trend to more mobile devices and internet via mobile phone networks. Open Standards, like the IETFs RFCs have enabled the success of the internet, as have Free Software implementations like sendmail, the TCP/IP stack that Microsoft integrated, the Apache Webserver and Web Browsers. There is a tendency to analyse data traffic and offer advertisments and content which shifts power to large software and "content" providers outside of Europe.
== View towards 2025 and beyond === How do you think the internet will look like in 2025 and beyond?
It is still there with many more devices and it will be still decentral. It is very hard to predict the development over a time frame of 10 years as the last 10 years have shown that we will see disruptive changes because of business models or policital events.
In a negative scenario corporations and autocratic countries will have gained more influence.
In an optimistic scenario self-confident countries like the EU will have grown technical, political and business power to shape the future for their citizens via a democratic process, protecting privacy and people's interest. Maybe even a charter of human internet rights will be developed.
=== What will be the essential functional building blocks of the Internet then?
Open access, open standards, regulation that aims for the balance of power of smaller organisations and people versus larger organisations and governments.
Free Software technology that offers software and hardware building blocks so that run the basic infrastructure from the network to the application layers.
=== Could you indicate where we should focus our activity research in the next 5-10 years to achieve? Are there new field of research to create/develop?
In order to enable privacy, research should look into a "proxy world", where the use of proxy businesses and technology will enable business models based on data without compromising individual privacy. This will have to be supported by technology and regulations.
Consider a business practive in Germany where pharmacies cannot be directly be coupled with medial doctors in order to support and offer an infrastructure that maintains decentral distribution of medial drugs. The same could be done for example with a video stream provider which would be force to run their stream through a business proxy, where a number of users for a city buys their stream and the data will be anonymized. The video vendor gets (most of)) the wanted data (which TV- show is watched how often), can even sell advertisment, but does not know the single customer, whos privacy is protected.
Another area is trusted computing, where research is necessary how regulation can force sure that each owner or intermediate can add their own trust anchor certificates in the chain for their devices or application. So that Google, Apple and Microsoft do not control the certificates for what can run on a certain machine. Example: If you want to run a webserver, you need a certificate that is within the common browsers, Microsoft is the main gatekeeper for this.
Second example: With "secure boot" or "app stores" only binary can be run that the providers of the software allow. Thus Apple controls the apps that can run on Smartphones and the Google Play store is the only app store on Android phones that can update applications all together automatically, other stores are second class.
A third area is open standards that adhere to the minimalistic design criteria for data exchange formats, which is important for competition and security. See my article https://fsfe.org/activities/os/minimalisticstandards.en.html .
A fourth area will be anonymous micropayment models, so that small content providers would have the ability to create business models without special right holding organisation like the German GEMA.
* Bernhard Reiter bernhard@fsfe.org [2016-04-13 13:41:51 +0200]:
Am Freitag, 8. April 2016 12:08:34 schrieb Matthias Kirschner:
From all we heard it is very helpful if you spent a few minutes and submit your ideas.
http://k7r.eu/urgent-help-until-10-april-to-influence-how-750-millions-will-...
I had about 45 Minutes to phrase my reply, I still hope it is useful.
I think you accomplished a very good result. Respect for writing that down in 45 minutes.
Do others also want to share their input here?
Best Regards, Matthias
Dear Matthias,
Op 28-04-16 om 08:03 schreef Matthias Kirschner:
Do others also want to share their input here?
The conclusion of my input:
Governments would be working to the benefit of the population if they would use and support free software, open standards, defend netneutralityhttps://quitter.no/tag/netneutrality and strong encryptionhttps://quitter.no/tag/encryption, stop mass surveillancehttps://quitter.no/tag/surveillance and keep allowing federationhttps://quitter.no/tag/federation, so that there will be more level playing field, more democratic legitimacy and a much safer internet. It's not rocket science to go free software, as the French police and the city of Munich have demonstrated. It takes good will and determination.
I've also shared this on Quitter [1].
Best regards,
Dear André,
* André Ockers ao@fsfe.org [2016-04-28 17:36:01 +0200]:
Governments would be working to the benefit of the population if they would use and support free software, open standards, defend netneutralityhttps://quitter.no/tag/netneutrality and strong encryptionhttps://quitter.no/tag/encryption, stop mass surveillancehttps://quitter.no/tag/surveillance and keep allowing federationhttps://quitter.no/tag/federation, so that there will be more level playing field, more democratic legitimacy and a much safer internet. It's not rocket science to go free software, as the French police and the city of Munich have demonstrated. It takes good will and determination.
Thanks for that. Matthias