Can anybody comment on whether FSFE has SIP or is planning to use SIP?
I notice an SRV record exists for _sip._udp.fsfe.org but no TLS record (there should also be _sips._tcp.fsfe.org)
I've recently proposed SIP service for debian.org and it would be fairly easy to replicate this for other free software communities, here are the details:
https://wiki.debian.org/UnifiedCommunications/DebianDevelopers
As I'm quite involved in the development of several of the necessary packages I'd be happy to help FSFE get them into use
hi, On Wed, Jan 08, 2014 at 08:44:30AM +0100, Daniel Pocock wrote:
Can anybody comment on whether FSFE has SIP or is planning to use SIP?
I notice an SRV record exists for _sip._udp.fsfe.org but no TLS record (there should also be _sips._tcp.fsfe.org)
i'm quite new in the fsfe systems administration, but if i read the documentation cerrectly the sip service is listed as historical, so i think the dns entry is only a leftover.
(i'm cc'ing system-hackers so that somebody can correct me if i'm wrong about that)
I've recently proposed SIP service for debian.org and it would be fairly easy to replicate this for other free software communities, here are the details:
https://wiki.debian.org/UnifiedCommunications/DebianDevelopers
As I'm quite involved in the development of several of the necessary packages I'd be happy to help FSFE get them into use
regardless of the current status of our sip service, thank you for the offer.
regards, albert
sry, forgot the actual cc :( On Wed, Jan 08, 2014 at 08:13:16PM +0100, Albert Dengg wrote:
hi, On Wed, Jan 08, 2014 at 08:44:30AM +0100, Daniel Pocock wrote:
Can anybody comment on whether FSFE has SIP or is planning to use SIP?
I notice an SRV record exists for _sip._udp.fsfe.org but no TLS record (there should also be _sips._tcp.fsfe.org)
i'm quite new in the fsfe systems administration, but if i read the documentation cerrectly the sip service is listed as historical, so i think the dns entry is only a leftover.
(i'm cc'ing system-hackers so that somebody can correct me if i'm wrong about that)
I've recently proposed SIP service for debian.org and it would be fairly easy to replicate this for other free software communities, here are the details:
https://wiki.debian.org/UnifiedCommunications/DebianDevelopers
As I'm quite involved in the development of several of the necessary packages I'd be happy to help FSFE get them into use
regardless of the current status of our sip service, thank you for the offer.
regards, albert
Hi Daniel,
* Daniel Pocock daniel@pocock.com.au [2014-01-08 08:44:30 +0100]:
Can anybody comment on whether FSFE has SIP or is planning to use SIP?
I notice an SRV record exists for _sip._udp.fsfe.org but no TLS record (there should also be _sips._tcp.fsfe.org)
This is a leftover. It was maintained by volunteers for some time and then it was no longer maintained.
I've recently proposed SIP service for debian.org and it would be fairly easy to replicate this for other free software communities, here are the details:
https://wiki.debian.org/UnifiedCommunications/DebianDevelopers
As I'm quite involved in the development of several of the necessary packages I'd be happy to help FSFE get them into use
Thank you very much for the offer, I would love to have this service.
Our system hackers will get in touch with you. This might take a bit, and at the moment they have to consolidate our infrastructure so it might be a bad time to introduce new services.
We also thought about the option of volunteers runing new services, but for sustainability we thought about the condition to have 3 Fellows commited to maintain the service, before we introdue it to all Fellows.
Regards, Matthias
On Monday 13 January 2014 13:53:07 Matthias Kirschner wrote:
We also thought about the option of volunteers runing new services, but for sustainability we thought about the condition to have 3 Fellows commited to maintain the service, before we introdue it to all Fellows.
I really like this concept. We could also explicitly mark these services as provided by fellows for fellows, so it is clear that it only runs as long as there are volunteers to maintain it.
We could even list the people taking care of a service on our homepage with little face icons and links to their blogs/homepages to give credit and to show potential users of the service who's behind it.
FSFE's fellowship would then provide the umbrella, the hardware and cover other related costs.
Kind Regards, Torsten