Dear list,
some news portals already picked it up and every FSFE supporter received a message about it in his inbox: today in the morning we launched a new campaign "Public Money Public Code".
For the campaign we published an open letter [1] together with 31 organisations in which we call for lawmakers to make it mandatory to publish all publicly financed software under a Free Software licence. Among the initial signatories are CCC, EDRi, KDE, Open Knowledge Foundation Germany, openSUSE, Open Source Business Alliance, Open Source Initiative, The Document Foundation, Wikimedia Deutschland, as well as several others.
Prominent support we also got from Edward Snowden, who says: "Right now, the blueprints for much of our most critical public infrastructure are simply unavailable to the public. By aligning public funding with a Free Software requirement -- "Free" referring to public code availability, not cost -- we can find and fix flaws before they are used to turn the lights out in the next hospital."
You find the whole press-release here: https://fsfe.org/news/2017/news-20170913-01.en.html
Now it is up to you! Please help and join us by signing this letter and ask your friends and colleagues to do likewise:
Why is this important? Public institutions spend millions of euros every year for the development of new software for them. But the public sector's procurement choices play a significant role in determining which companies are allowed to compete and what software is supported with taxpayers' money. This means, that changing policies in public procurement will have a huge positive impact on the Free Software community.
The open letter will be sent to candidates for the current German Parliament election and, during the coming months, until the 2019 EU parliament elections, to other representatives of the EU and EU member states.
Since it is our public money, it should be our public code as well!
This mail can and shall be copied and forwarded.
Best regards, Erik
[1] https://publiccode.eu/openletter/
Great work! I used the following brief text to share the PMPC campaign with software developers:
Public Money, Public Code: Publicly Funded Software Has to Be Free Software We want legislation requiring that publicly financed software developed for the public sector be made publicly available under a Free and Open Source Software licence. If it is public money, it should be public code as well.
"I can't say how much I support this, it is so obviously a good idea" -- https://twitter.com/hanno/status/907904636283224064 I have nothing to add. Sign the open letter! :-)
Many organizations (incl. WikiMedia, CCC, KDE, OSI) signed the open letter, please sign it too: https://publiccode.eu/openletter/
Press coverage (German): * http://www.spiegel.de/netzwelt/netzpolitik/public-code-aktivisten-fordern-fr... * https://www.heise.de/newsticker/meldung/Kampagne-Public-Code-Software-fuer-d... * https://netzpolitik.org/2017/kampagne-oeffentliches-geld-oeffentlicher-code/
Hacker News: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=15236686
On 13.09.2017 15:58, Erik Albers wrote:
Dear list,
some news portals already picked it up and every FSFE supporter received a message about it in his inbox: today in the morning we launched a new campaign "Public Money Public Code".
For the campaign we published an open letter [1] together with 31 organisations in which we call for lawmakers to make it mandatory to publish all publicly financed software under a Free Software licence. Among the initial signatories are CCC, EDRi, KDE, Open Knowledge Foundation Germany, openSUSE, Open Source Business Alliance, Open Source Initiative, The Document Foundation, Wikimedia Deutschland, as well as several others.
Prominent support we also got from Edward Snowden, who says: "Right now, the blueprints for much of our most critical public infrastructure are simply unavailable to the public. By aligning public funding with a Free Software requirement -- "Free" referring to public code availability, not cost -- we can find and fix flaws before they are used to turn the lights out in the next hospital."
You find the whole press-release here: https://fsfe.org/news/2017/news-20170913-01.en.html
Now it is up to you! Please help and join us by signing this letter and ask your friends and colleagues to do likewise:
Why is this important? Public institutions spend millions of euros every year for the development of new software for them. But the public sector's procurement choices play a significant role in determining which companies are allowed to compete and what software is supported with taxpayers' money. This means, that changing policies in public procurement will have a huge positive impact on the Free Software community.
The open letter will be sent to candidates for the current German Parliament election and, during the coming months, until the 2019 EU parliament elections, to other representatives of the EU and EU member states.
Since it is our public money, it should be our public code as well!
This mail can and shall be copied and forwarded.
Best regards, Erik
Hello Henning,
thanks for that. I really like the short message!
Best Regards, Matthias
* Henning Jacobs [2017-09-13 19:40 +0200]:
Public Money, Public Code: Publicly Funded Software Has to Be Free Software We want legislation requiring that publicly financed software developed for the public sector be made publicly available under a Free and Open Source Software licence. If it is public money, it should be public code as well.
"I can't say how much I support this, it is so obviously a good idea" -- https://twitter.com/hanno/status/907904636283224064 I have nothing to add. Sign the open letter! :-)
Many organizations (incl. WikiMedia, CCC, KDE, OSI) signed the open letter, please sign it too: https://publiccode.eu/openletter/
Press coverage (German):
http://www.spiegel.de/netzwelt/netzpolitik/public-code-aktivisten-fordern-fr...
https://www.heise.de/newsticker/meldung/Kampagne-Public-Code-Software-fuer-d...
https://netzpolitik.org/2017/kampagne-oeffentliches-geld-oeffentlicher-code/
Hacker News: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=15236686
Erik Albers eal@fsfe.org wrote:
Now it is up to you! Please help and join us by signing this letter and ask your friends and colleagues to do likewise:
There may be license issue due to resources like: https://publiccode.eu/css/bootstrap.min.css
They contain a "Licensed under MIT (https://github.com/twbs/bootstrap/blob/master/LICENSE)" comment but not the license text itself.
Probably the issue is inherited from upstream and presumably upstream doesn't care too much about license compliance but for an FSFE website this situation doesn't seem ideal.
Fabian
* Fabian Keil [2017-09-15 11:16 +0200]:
There may be license issue due to resources like: https://publiccode.eu/css/bootstrap.min.css
They contain a "Licensed under MIT (https://github.com/twbs/bootstrap/blob/master/LICENSE)" comment but not the license text itself.
Probably the issue is inherited from upstream and presumably upstream doesn't care too much about license compliance but for an FSFE website this situation doesn't seem ideal.
From our understanding the original author wants you to do it that way
and not change it otherwise (which also makes kind of sense for a file like that):
https://v4-alpha.getbootstrap.com/about/license/
Regards, Matthias
Today, just now, I contacted one of the FSFE staff, and also sent patches that I made the day before yesterday.
Now I'm waiting for a reply to start a discussion.
I hope this helps.
2017-09-15T10:16:55+0200 Fabian Keil wrote:
Erik Albers eal@fsfe.org wrote:
There may be license issue due to resources like: https://publiccode.eu/css/bootstrap.min.css
They contain a "Licensed under MIT (https://github.com/twbs/bootstrap/blob/master/LICENSE)" comment but not the license text itself.
Probably the issue is inherited from upstream and presumably upstream doesn't care too much about license compliance but for an FSFE website this situation doesn't seem ideal.
Fabian
I would go even further and say that code development funded by public money should be made free software, regardless if it is to be used by the public sector or not. That starts already to be the case with research funded via the Horizon 2020 research fund. Fernando
No dia 11/12/2017, às 16:29, Adonay Felipe Nogueira adfeno@hyperbola.info escreveu:
Today, just now, I contacted one of the FSFE staff, and also sent patches that I made the day before yesterday.
Now I'm waiting for a reply to start a discussion.
I hope this helps.
2017-09-15T10:16:55+0200 Fabian Keil wrote:
Erik Albers eal@fsfe.org wrote:
There may be license issue due to resources like: https://publiccode.eu/css/bootstrap.min.css
They contain a "Licensed under MIT (https://github.com/twbs/bootstrap/blob/master/LICENSE)" comment but not the license text itself.
Probably the issue is inherited from upstream and presumably upstream doesn't care too much about license compliance but for an FSFE website this situation doesn't seem ideal.
Fabian
--
- https://libreplanet.org/wiki/User:Adfeno https://libreplanet.org/wiki/User:Adfeno
- Palestrante e consultor sobre /software/ livre (não confundir com
gratis).
- "WhatsApp"? Ele não é livre. Por favor, veja formas de se comunicar
instantaneamente comigo no endereço abaixo.
- Contato: https://libreplanet.org/wiki/User:Adfeno#vCard https://libreplanet.org/wiki/User:Adfeno#vCard
- Arquivos comuns aceitos (apenas sem DRM): Corel Draw, Microsoft
Office, MP3, MP4, WMA, WMV.
- Arquivos comuns aceitos e enviados: CSV, GNU Dia, GNU Emacs Org, GNU
GIMP, Inkscape SVG, JPG, LibreOffice (padrão ODF), OGG, OPUS, PDF (apenas sem DRM), PNG, TXT, WEBM. _______________________________________________ Discussion mailing list Discussion@lists.fsfe.org mailto:Discussion@lists.fsfe.org https://lists.fsfe.org/mailman/listinfo/discussion https://lists.fsfe.org/mailman/listinfo/discussion
* Fernando Reis [2017-12-11 21:15 +0100]:
I would go even further and say that code development funded by public money should be made free software, regardless if it is to be used by the public sector or not.
Isn't that what we ask for on https://publiccode.eu ?
Why is software created using taxpayers’ money not released as Free Software?
We want legislation requiring that publicly financed software developed for the public sector be made publicly available under a Free and Open Source Software licence. If it is public money, it should be public code as well.
That starts already to be the case with research funded via the Horizon 2020 research fund.
Yes, absolutely. Please have a look at https://fsfe.org/news/2017/news-20170105-01.en.html and the referenced paper, where we ask for that.
Regards, Matthias
Thank you for the reference to the position paper, Mathias. It is in fact broader and goes beyond software to be used by the public sector. Fernando
No dia 12/12/2017, às 08:21, Matthias Kirschner mk@fsfe.org escreveu:
- Fernando Reis [2017-12-11 21:15 +0100]:
I would go even further and say that code development funded by public money should be made free software, regardless if it is to be used by the public sector or not.
Isn't that what we ask for on https://publiccode.eu ?
Why is software created using taxpayers’ money not released as Free Software?
We want legislation requiring that publicly financed software developed for the public sector be made publicly available under a Free and Open Source Software licence. If it is public money, it should be public code as well.
That starts already to be the case with research funded via the Horizon 2020 research fund.
Yes, absolutely. Please have a look at https://fsfe.org/news/2017/news-20170105-01.en.html and the referenced paper, where we ask for that.
Regards, Matthias
-- Matthias Kirschner - President - Free Software Foundation Europe Schönhauser Allee 6/7, 10119 Berlin, Germany | t +49-30-27595290 Registered at Amtsgericht Hamburg, VR 17030 | (fsfe.org/join) Contact (fsfe.org/about/kirschner) - Weblog (k7r.eu/blog.html) _______________________________________________ Discussion mailing list Discussion@lists.fsfe.org https://lists.fsfe.org/mailman/listinfo/discussion