-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256
Hi guys
I've incorporated the latest suggestions and squeezed everything down by about 200 words.
==
Q: How can I give a speech about Free Software?
A: Know your audience! If you are talking about Free Software, talk about it in a way that will genuinely engage the target audience. Taylor your delivery to suit the people, and that way you will get a positive result. If you are speaking to media students, don't go into details regarding engineering methodology. If you are speaking to computer science students, don't do a statistical analysis to show a good TCO (Total Cost of Operation).
Make the presentation fun. Don't look like a teacher, but more like a student: don't stay behind a desk, walk around and involve the audience by asking questions.
Q: What important aspects of Free Software should I highlight?
A: There are many things you can talk about to show the benefits of Free Software. The four freedoms (free use, free modification, free sharing, free improving) are important, but are not the only things you can bring into a speech. If you are talking to political students, you might want to highlight the empowerment aspects of Free Software for developing nations. If you are talking to computer science students, you might want to highlight the advantages of Free Software licenses and the flexibility they bring to both community-driven and in-house development models.
It's important to emphasise that Free doesn't mean price, it means Freedom.
Q: What about questions regarding the legality of Free Software?
A: You can point out that Free Software has attracted virtually no lawsuits. In the case of SCO the lawsuit is falling apart because SCO actually have no evidence. Free Software is not illegal.
The GNU GPL went to court on three occasions, twice in Germany and once in the USA. The license was considered valid in all cases. More information about this is available on http://www.fsf.org/news/wallace-vs-fsf, http://www.netfilter.org/news/2004-04-15-sitecom-gpl.html and http://www.ifross.de/ifross_html/home1_2006.html#ARTIKEL15.
Q: What about questions regarding quality control in Free Software?
A: The quality of software depends on many factors. If a project is well managed it should have a very high standard of quality. This is true for free and non-free software. The problem is that non-free software precludes the possibility of peer-review. Proprietary software is a black box. You have to trust the company that produced that box. There is no way to verify your trust.
Free software is not always higher quality, but everyone has the right to examine it and make improvements if desired.
Q: What about questions regarding sabotage of Free Software?
A: You can point out that Free Software fosters open development. Someone may try to introduce something bad, but the open review process means this damage will be spotted and removed. It is far more likely that a hostile force could slip something into a closed system.
Examples of Free Software community audits include the backdoors discovered in Firebird when the sources where released the first time; or the tentative move to include backdoors in the Linux kernel that didn't last more than a few hours.
Q: What about questions about the difference between Free Software and Open Source?
A: The Open Source Initiative proposed the term 'Open Source' as a marketing term for Free Software. Their choice of terminology weakened Free Software's unique selling point (freedom), and introduced confusion through ambiguous terminology.
This is about choosing the most effective terminology to accomplish a purpose. It is important to select a terminology that does not easily yield to misappropriation. The problem with the term Open Source is that it refers to having access to source code, but access to the source code is only a precondition for two of the four freedoms that define Free Software. The term Free Software avoids catering to this relatively common misunderstanding.
If someone is interested in clarity of language then it's important to talk about Free Software. Remember, we're talking free as in freedom. We want to ensure that people are free to use, modify, share and improve software.
Q: How should I characterise software companies like Microsoft?
A: Always be aware that there may be Microsoft people in the audience that can stand up any time to correct you if you don't stick to the truth! You should try to talk about non-free software companies in general (avoid names) as bad examples of how they treat their customers, forcing upgrades or taking away their data in unknown formats.
Microsoft is a natural product of a wrong approach. They are the worst curtailer of freedom, but that's only because they've been the most successful. Others are trying very hard to restrict the freedom of users in the same way as Microsoft.
We need to fix the general approach.
Q: What should I say if people suggest Free Software is for tree-hugging hippies?
A: We use the four freedoms of software to ensure that software users have a certain standard of rights. Software development and usage is still a new activity, and it's history and philosophical thinking is still relatively shallow. People using software don't have many rights and they are being exploited. Free Software is about setting a measure for how people should be treated.
If you're talking to a business audience, you can describe this as a procurement policy. Procurement policies usually spell out minimum requirements for purchasing and usage:
"Software providers must not prevent the company from seeing what the software does"
"Software providers must not prevent the company from making improvements, customising, fixing bugs - or commissioning others to do these things for the company"
"Software providers will not prevent the publication of any improvements which the collective users of the software make or commission."
Q: Where should I point people to find out more?
A: The Free Software Foundation Europe website (www.fsfeurope.org), the Free Software Foundation website (www.fsf.org). Perhaps you could point people to FSF Latin America, FSF India and Groklaw.
You can obtain some information on presentations given by Ciaran O'Riordan of the FSFE at http://ciaran.compsoc.com/#roadshow
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256
Stefano Maffulli wrote:
Shane, you are officially a Fellow Hero :) Lets find a place for this on fsfe.org. Do you have suggestions?
I have been poking around fsfe.org and I confess that it's a more difficult question than I had expected. There is no section of the current site that immediately strikes me as being suitable. I suggest the creation of a new value in the side menu 'Advocacy' that also links to the advocacy forum.
Shane
- -- Shane Martin Coughlan e: shane@opendawn.com m: +447773180107 (UK) +353862262570 (Ire) w: www.opendawn.com - --- OpenPGP: http://www.opendawn.com/shane/publickey.asc
On Sat, 2006-07-08 at 23:10 +0100, Shane M. Coughlan wrote:
I have been poking around fsfe.org and I confess that it's a more difficult question than I had expected. There is no section of the current site that immediately strikes me as being suitable. I suggest the creation of a new value in the side menu 'Advocacy' that also links to the advocacy forum.
I agree with your analysis. I have created a new section, Advocacy, where fellows can put content.
If you want, I will be online on jabber today and we can discuss how to structure those pages and start putting the FAQ online.
bye stef
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256
Stefano Maffulli wrote:
I agree with your analysis. I have created a new section, Advocacy, where fellows can put content. If you want, I will be online on jabber today and we can discuss how to structure those pages and start putting the FAQ online.
Hi Stef
I have created a suggested text for the first page of the new advocacy section:
== Advocacy is a critical part of supporting a movement like Free Software. It is part-education, part-advertising. It is where we share our enthusiasm for Free Software and in the process make other people enthusiastic about it too. This is where every fellow can make a significant contribution to the FSFE and share our ideals with computer users, computer programmers and technology enthusiasts everywhere.
Advocacy is not just formal lectures. You can advocate Free Software when you talk to your coworkers, when you attend a conference and when you visit a LUG. Advocacy is about engaging people with our ideals in a positive and constructive manner.
There are no rules to advocacy. However, there are some tips to help ensure that audiences are engaged and and goals are accomplished. This part of the fellowship site is intended to collect our tips together so we can improve and coordinate our individual advocacy. If you have presentation notes, tips or guides you would like to see added please email <INSERTEMAIL>. ==
I think we should have a FAQ section (with the FAQ in several languages if possible).
A section for presentations - as you suggested in the chatroom - would be great. The problem is just that we don't have many presentations. I guess Ciaran's can go up right away, and perhaps I can generate a couple on discussion@?
Shane
- -- Shane Martin Coughlan e: shane@opendawn.com m: +447773180107 (UK) +353862262570 (Ire) w: www.opendawn.com - --- OpenPGP: http://www.opendawn.com/shane/publickey.asc