The Economist magazine(Government and IT, May 4th 2002) reports that government is not only the largest buyer of IT, but it gets extraordinarily bad value for money. The UK Inland Revenue (tax office) had a £1.4Bn overrun from a single contractor.(Yes billion not million.)
(Note: the above contracts were all-inclusive hardware, software, implementation and maitenance.)
The people spending this money are also the ones who write the legislation. They must have some interest in cost effectiveness, (assuming they are not swayed by arguments for their own liberty).
1) Are any companies bidding for government contracts with Free Software solutions?
2) Are we presenting cost related issues of liberty to legislators? (ie if the solution is free software based you can fire the contractor without scrapping the project.)
3) Are there any examples of better ways for large institutions to implement IT. ( eg decentralized, each office looks after its own LAN and outward connetions. This might involve applying free software development methods to building the physical network as well as sharing actual software.)
Nick Hockings
s96121272@op.up.ac.za, s96121272@tuks.co.za, nickh@nupedia.com
On Sat, May 04, 2002 at 11:02:44PM +0200, Nick Hockings wrote:
- Are any companies bidding for government contracts with Free Software
solutions?
- Are we presenting cost related issues of liberty to legislators? (ie if the
solution is free software based you can fire the contractor without scrapping the project.)
You should take a look at http://www.freedevelopers.net.
Jeroen Dekkers