Dear Jonas and Bjorn,
Thank you for sending and for uploading in Keybase the updated version aimed for usage scenario 1 and 2 (O2-A1_Content Unit 4_v5_for_usage_scenario_1_and_2.odt) and the updated version aimed for usage scenario 3 (filename "O2-A1_Content Unit 4_v5_for_usage_scenario_3.pdf").
Can you please indicate the difference between the two texts provided? It is not clear to me what are the changes incorporated. In particular, I could not identify the modifications, based on the remarks of the 2nd Peer Review (by Sivan). Also, some parts have no images, so I kindly ask you to add a few, as we need to provide a uniform result.
Which brings me to my main point. The unit you provided contains very useful information, but it is too “academic”. Please consider the feedback provided from Sivan in view of a more unified and consistent training course. I would like to remind you that this is a VET level project/training course and that the target audience is mainly EU SMEs with little or no experience in FOSS, which we understand is not your usual audience. From the coordinator’s point of view, we consider it is necessary that you modify your contribution, as at the moment it stands out as an outlier.
Thank you for sharing with us your deep knowledge in the field. As an EU SME with little experience with FOSS ourselves, we have been learning a lot throughout the course of the FOSS4SMEs project. I am looking forward to your feedback.
Best regards, Katerina
Στις Πέμ, 28 Φεβ 2019 στις 3:14 μ.μ., ο/η Jonas Gamalielsson < jonas.gamalielsson@his.se> έγραψε:
Dear Katerina,
After consideration of review comments (in all review rounds), please find an updated version aimed for usage scenario 1 and 2 (O2-A1_Content Unit 4_v5_for_usage_scenario_1_and_2.odt) and an updated version aimed for usage scenario 3 (filename "O2-A1_Content Unit 4_v5_for_usage_scenario_3.pdf") in the following folder of the Keybase platform:
"K:\team\foss4smes\2. Implementation\Outputs\Output 2\A1 Training course contents\Peer Review - 2nd round\After Peer Review"
We also attach the files to this email.
Please advise us when we can go ahead with our conduct of assessment according to usage scenario 3 as detailed in the guidelines in the document "O2/A4 assessment methodology and tools" (see K:\team\foss4smes\2. Implementation\Outputs\Output 2\A4 Assessment\O2_A4_assessment_description_v2.pdf) and in the FOSS4SMEs minutes from the telco on 19 February 2019 (K:\team\foss4smes\5. Meetings\Telcos\FOSS4SMEs_Minutes_20190219.pdf).
From past experiences and dialogues with SMEs, we find that it is very important to give them as much calender time as possible for the assessments. Therefore, we find that it is now urgent that each partner can proceed with step 1 (of the five steps) as detailed in section "5. Guidelines" in the document "O2/A4 assessment methodology and tools".
Best Jonas & Björn
Jonas Gamalielsson, PhD
Software Systems Research Group Informatics Research Specialisation University of Skövde P.O. Box 408 SE-541 28 SKÖVDE SWEDEN Office: Portalen, floor 4, room 410r Tel: +46 (0)500-448375 Fax: +46 (0)500-416325 Email: jonas.gamalielsson@his.se Web: http://www.his.se/gamj
