-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
On 13 Sep 2003 at 11:02, Ian Clarke wrote:
How exactly are we responding to the McCarthy FUD about the anti-patents movement? I know that ffii has put together a rebuttal - but is that being exposed to the right audience?
The Irish MEP's I'm told have excellent FUD filters because of usually weekly meetings with their constituents. What I can say is that their response to our campaign on this directive has been far more constructive than the similar response in the UK.
I am surprised that nobody has put together a spreadsheet of MEPs together with their positions, and likelihood that their positions might be swayed.
My understanding is that 13 of 15 are anti-patent. But the "common position" directive is preferred over the JURI one and I'm not sure that's warranted. I've asked Helmut Pilch for a copy of this original original directive, but so far he's not replied. Also, don't publish such a list in public, PGP it or something.
I hope I am wrong - but from my distant vantage point over here in California - it seems like momentum has dissipated somewhat since the protests.
Actually we have reached a level of coordination, activity and cohesiveness unparalleled before. This last two months has been amazing - we actually are having an effect. I think this is in no small part down to (a) the campaign money pledged by certain benefactors like George Soros and (b) we're sounding with one voice, plus instead of talking we're now lobbying.
What remains to be done? Who still needs to be persuaded? What must they be persuaded of? Who is coordinating this effort?
In Ireland I think we've done brilliantly given all factors concerned. The UK has been much harder, most especially because British MEP's are from this experience anyway completely devoid of capacity for independent thought. They just vote and believe as party central tells them to :(
This does not mean the battle is over. New letter someone? I can't write it because no one ever understands me :)
Cheers, Niall