hi,
Minutes [Glenn Strong ] wrote:
- We should assemble a list of current amendments (as they come out)
Use these to indicate to our MEPs the kind of amendments we would consider acceptable and unacceptable.
- remove the proposer information (to remove any prejudice that may be associated with the name).
- Identify each as a Yes/No for our position.
- Briefly discuss our reasoning for each decision.
Aidan Delaney wrote:
Ok. But we still have to push the ideal that swpats are bad and we don't wan them, full-stop.
this is the line with the stance i have been asked to adopt for this group http://webarchitects.co.uk/ - my next email is going to be to our local mp richard allen who has this blog http://www.sheffieldhallam.co.uk/blog/index.php ... with the same attachment as i have put on this one - laura creightons analysis is the coherent argument of the small to medium size business
Minutes [Glenn Strong ] wrote:
- We could provide a "throwaway" web site (e.g. irish-anti-e-patents.org) that we could direct people to.
Aidan Delaney wrote:
It looks like I may be getting http://ifso.cs.may.ie, if that's any help.
if it would help we could set up a site on our servers which run http://mkdoc.com/ - this would allow for multiple editors, rss import and export, all the usual spiel - we could set it up at a temporary domain until one was picked - Ciaran could blog away happilly until more folk joined in ;) ... and we'd be able to re-purpose each others content to suit firstly our mutual and secondly individual goals - my guess its all the same goal in any case
strange how the same mode of production used for FLOSS is now our friend again to protect it - you never know; there may be hope :)
-- adam