- It is a little over-branded as an IFSO production. Although it clearly states that it is "based on Morphix", I think that we might want to return one of their splash screens and include some more information about the precise relationship between our and their product.
I agree it's a little over branded, our logos make it look like we wrote the whole thing, when in fact we just took someone else's and put our name on it (just too much fun playing with the logo). How about putting the morphix logo on the bootup screens, and adding a section to the index.html to describe the the relationship between out live cd and morphix. Also the information directly available to the user on the cd is a little thin, no information on common problems, no information about IFSO apart from a few vague mentions.
If they are looking for a CD image fast, I think the safer bet might be to go for a standard Knoppix or Morphix image.
I agree, our cd is essentially the current Morphix release with new logos. The current Morphix cd isn't even 1.0 release yet. Knoppix 3.3 seems to have slightly better hardware support, i don't know when the Morphix people branched off from Knoppix.
Talking about the CDs: They were all gone from the conference last night. If anyone has the time and technology, could they burn a few more. I'll collect them and drop them over, if necessary.
I can do another 20, and drop them over this evening. We should keep tack of how many of these CDs are "in the wild", it would be a useful statistic.
I don't think we should explicitly tell the newspaper not to use our cd image, but rather give them enough information on out live cd and the others out there so they can choose themselves, this includes telling them that we not be able/want to support every cd given out.
David C.