Justin Mason jm@jmason.org writes:
From: Donal Cunningham donal@ie.sage.org
...
A draft framework decision on Traffic Data Retention has been published.
...
Summary:
1 year for telephony 6 months for IP traffic
Can you give some more info about this? Are those maximums or minimums? and are they better or worse than what's in place?
...and could you retry sending that document that got mangled. (In a non-proprietary format preferably. http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html )
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
Ciaran -- I forwarded it. I think you meant to send to Donal directly ;)
- --j.
Ciaran O'Riordan writes:
Justin Mason jm@jmason.org writes:
From: Donal Cunningham donal@ie.sage.org
...
A draft framework decision on Traffic Data Retention has been published.
...
Summary:
1 year for telephony 6 months for IP traffic
Can you give some more info about this? Are those maximums or minimums? and are they better or worse than what's in place?
...and could you retry sending that document that got mangled. (In a non-proprietary format preferably. http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html )
EDRi have a campaign/petition going on this right now in response to the Commission proposal on data retention from 20.07.2005
http://www.edri.org/ http://www.edri.org/edrigram/number3.15/commission http://www.dataretentionisnosolution.com/
Teresa
Ciaran O'Riordan wrote:
Justin Mason jm@jmason.org writes:
From: Donal Cunningham donal@ie.sage.org
...
A draft framework decision on Traffic Data Retention has been published.
...
Summary:
1 year for telephony 6 months for IP traffic
Can you give some more info about this? Are those maximums or minimums? and are they better or worse than what's in place?
...and could you retry sending that document that got mangled. (In a non-proprietary format preferably. http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html )