Isnt one point of our argument that offering ONE choice (not just a non-free choice, but only one option) is agaisnt the law becuase its monopoly-ish. like you should have more than one web brouser etc?
Anna
On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 1:02 PM, Matthias Kirschner mk@fsfe.org wrote:
Just a short note:
- Sam Tuke samtuke@fsfe.org [2011-10-03 13:03:02 +0100]:
Having said all that, the Council will act on your suggestion and add
text to
clarify that other PDF readers are available.
That's good.
However, we will not be linking to the PDFreaders.org site that you provided as we do not consider that it offers the genuine range of options that most site visitors would be interested in.
If they continue to just link to Adobe, it is an unfair competition advantage. This way they will make sure this area will be a monopoly.
Regards, Matthias
-- Matthias Kirschner - FSFE - Fellowship Coordinator, German Coordinator FSFE, Linienstr. 141, 10115 Berlin, t +49-30-27595290 +49-1577-1780003 Free Software is important to you? Join today! (fsfe.org/join) Weblog (blogs.fsfe.org/mk) - Contact (fsfe.org/about/kirschner) _______________________________________________ Manchester mailing list Manchester@lists.fsfe.org https://lists.fsfe.org/mailman/listinfo/manchester