Otto Kekäläinen otto@fsfe.org, Tue, 24 Sep 2013 08:08:05 +0300:
2013/9/18 Paul Hänsch paul@fsfe.org:
...
Relax, I don't think you need to stress yourself with all possible options.
Am I right to understand, that you had a part in laying down the original specifications of the site? The oral description of the requirements, which I received about a year ago, seemed indeed to necessitate the steps described by me.
The main purpose of the site is to be an alternative to www.adobe.com/en/products/reader.html, and the mission of the site is to get public administration sites to link to pdfreaders.org instead of adobe.com. The goal is met if you can download installers for Windows and Mac.
Then at the current point in time this goal is not met.
All the others are just extras, and if you don't feel good about making more download options, then don't. The site will be just fine.
This assessment is in vast contrast to the feedback I received from Hannes and to my own evaluation.
The site you are speaking about is currently online on: http://pdfr.plutonium.fsfeurope.org Please make sure that we are talking about the same thing when you say that this is "just fine".
How to make it so, that it *will* be just fine, was the original question of my last email.
I realise, that I might sound pushy here, but the point I raised is an actual, specific, and immediate issue, which requires attention. It cannot just be waived away.
The question is still in the room: How should we continue? I've listed the available options.