Hello everyone,
As I don't who receive the mail, I am speaking in english althought it is not my best language, so please excuse me for the mistakes. I discover the petition in order to detect the web site of the European government/institution which does not respect their neutrality obligation. I approve that and so I sign the petition but in the page which explain and suggest some free pdf readers, we can read a sentence which is not neutral and I find it especially libellous because any source/proof is mentionned. You could find below the sentence (as in english as in french) ; for me it is the last part of the sentence which is libellous.
EN :
Other proprietary alternatives to Adobe's PDF reader also exist, but like it, their internal working is a trade secret and these programs do not respect your right to control your own privacy and data. web page : http://www.pdfreaders.org/index.en.html
FR :
D’autres alternatives propriétaires au lecteur de PDF d'Adobe existent, mais tout comme pour ce dernier, leur fonctionnement interne est un secret commercial et aucun de ces programmes ne respecte votre vie privée ou la confidentialité de vos données. page web : http://www.pdfreaders.org/index.fr.html
As I know principle and philosophy of Free Software, and also PDF Readers as Acrobat Reader but users too, your web site must explain and prove what it is bad in these software (How Adobe do not respect our own privacy and what Adobe are doing about these stolen information). Personally, I do not know what information are stolen and I'm interesting to know them.
Thank you to take notice about my request and I hope you could improve this page with my remark. I'm ready to help you if you want more information about my mind. Best Regards, B. Chomel