(Sebastian wrote that we still use the subject "Advertising for proprietary software on your website" for our model letter. I agree that we should change that. If someone has suggestions please let me know.)
Hallo Sebastian,
* Sebastian Pipping sebastian@pipping.org [2011-04-13 17:29:40 +0200]:
On 04/13/2011 04:14 PM, Matthias Kirschner wrote:
Hi Sebastian,
- Sebastian Pipping sebastian@pipping.org [2011-04-11 18:46:25 +0200]:
Diese Woche wollen wir unseren Entwurf von https://wiki.fsfe.org/PdfreadersFollowUp noch auf den Webseiten veröffentlichen.
[..]
- Das discouraged subject "Advertising for proprietary software on your website" wird immernoch von eurem Model-Letter verwendet: http://fsfe.org/campaigns/pdfreaders/letter.de.html
Was meinst Du damit?
Sektion "Find the right subject of your email" auf Seite https://wiki.fsfe.org/PdfreadersFollowUp wurde inzwischen geändert.
Ah ok, das hat Natalia noch geändert.
Vorher stand da, dass man mit einem Betreff wie "Advertising for proprietary software on your website" leicht in Spam oder Trash landet, was aber genau der Betreff ist, den ihr im Model letter auf http://fsfe.org/campaigns/pdfreaders/letter.en.html vorschlagt:
Dear Mr or Ms,
Subject: Advertising for proprietary software on your website
...
Da hast Du recht.
Vielleicht sollte der Model letter wirklich einen anderen Betreff haben, auch beim ersten Anschreiben schon.
Hast Du eine Idee für einen besseren Betreff?
Viele Grüße Matthias
Hi!
Il 19/04/2011 09:09, Matthias Kirschner ha scritto:
(Sebastian wrote that we still use the subject "Advertising for proprietary software on your website" for our model letter. I agree that we should change that. If someone has suggestions please let me know.)
If we are asking to the institution to take in consideration our letter that we sent at the end of 2010 is think that the best subject is simply "Letter of FSFE from December 2010".
I think that with the subject we have to point to the fact that we wrote to theme and they didn't answer.
Ciao, Massimo
* Massimo Barbieri massimo@fsfe.org [2011-04-19 10:22:47 +0200]:
Hi!
Il 19/04/2011 09:09, Matthias Kirschner ha scritto:
(Sebastian wrote that we still use the subject "Advertising for proprietary software on your website" for our model letter. I agree that we should change that. If someone has suggestions please let me know.)
If we are asking to the institution to take in consideration our letter that we sent at the end of 2010 is think that the best subject is simply "Letter of FSFE from December 2010".
We have not sent all of them in December. It might be difficult to find out when they were send in the different countries.
I think that with the subject we have to point to the fact that we wrote to theme and they didn't answer.
Sebastian proposed: "Issues with your links to {Adobe Acrobat Reader}"
What do you think? Matthias
Hi!
Il 20/04/2011 11:38, Matthias Kirschner ha scritto:
We have not sent all of them in December. It might be difficult to find out when they were send in the different countries.
I think that this is not a big problem, we don't need to be very precise. We could use "Letter of FSFE sent on 2010" or "Letter of FSFE waiting for answer". My idea is that we have to point to the fact that we wrote to them and they didn't answer. Since we are talking about public bodies this could be a serious think and I suppose that they will pay attention to this. But this is just my idea...
Sebastian proposed: "Issues with your links to {Adobe Acrobat Reader}" What do you think?
In most of the cases the email will be sent to a person that probably don't know much about link or software. We have to get her/his attention. I think that this subject is not so useful to get their attention. Is also difficult to people to understand how a link can be a problem. But, as I said, this is just my idea.
Ciao, Massimo
On 20/04/2011 17:50, Massimo Barbieri wrote:
Hi!
Il 20/04/2011 11:38, Matthias Kirschner ha scritto:
We have not sent all of them in December. It might be difficult to find out when they were send in the different countries.
I think that this is not a big problem, […]
Sebastian proposed: "Issues with your links to {Adobe Acrobat Reader}" What do you think?
[…] Is also difficult to people to understand how a link can be a problem.
I agree with Massimo and believe that a letter that does not speak of a "problem" but brings people to deal with a not-yet-answer letter will be more efficient.
* Nicolas JEAN nicoulas@fsfe.org [2011-04-21 11:40:50 +0200]:
Sebastian proposed: "Issues with your links to {Adobe Acrobat Reader}" What do you think?
[…] Is also difficult to people to understand how a link can be a problem.
I agree with Massimo and believe that a letter that does not speak of a "problem" but brings people to deal with a not-yet-answer letter will be more efficient.
Ok, changed that on http://fsfe.org/campaigns/pdfreaders/follow-up.en.html.
Will sent out the news item in the next minutes.
Regards, Matthias