brainstorming: which formats to use and which to avoid
wk at gnupg.org
Wed Jun 20 11:50:36 UTC 2001
|| On 20 Jun 2001 12:04:26 +0100
|| MJ Ray <markj at cloaked.freeserve.co.uk> wrote:
mr> I seem to recall that SSH Communications threw a fit over people using
mr> the (trademarked?) name of their product to describe compatible
I was not anymore aware of that. The claims are ridiculous but of
course we should use the term as used in the IETF draft.
Trademarking a standard protocol name effectivly makes that standard
Werner Koch Omnis enim res, quae dando non deficit, dum habetur
g10 Code GmbH et non datur, nondum habetur, quomodo habenda est.
Privacy Solutions -- Augustinus
More information about the Discussion