[Fsfe-ie] Previous meeting with MEP Brian Crowley
sean at odonnell.nu
Thu Mar 31 16:10:08 CEST 2005
>He backed up his copyright beliefs by citing a George Harrison copyright
>case. Crowley said that Harrison lost the case despite never having heard
>the music it was claimed he copied. Thus, copyright required newness, and
>Harisson lost because his work was not new.
>On later research, I read that Harrison never claimed not to have heard the
>song he was accused of copying. Crowley had clearly mixed up the facts, or
>had mixed up facts fed to him.
Unless I am very much mistaken, Independent invention is a legitimate
defence against a copyright
claim , unlike a patent claim, anyone care to correct me?
If I am correct then copyright does not require 'newness'
I know that we are both saying the same thing, I am just wondering if
anyone else can confirm that?
More information about the FSFE-IE