Discussion

discussion@lists.fsfe.org

3273 discussions

Anonymous Voting System
by Jan Wey. 31 Mar '20

31 Mar '20

Hello everyone, Due to not being able to gather in groups right now, I am currently in need to organize some online sitting of a group (25 ppl), probably via jitsi-meet. At some point, there will be votes regarding numerous things, which should be anonymous. Initially, I thought about simply using Dudle[0] (*NOT* doodle), where participants would simply not give their names (hence, anonymous). However, this comes with several issues. For one, we would be unable to confirm that everyone casted their vote. Secondly, if someone voted twice, we could not see that either. So there is some potential for manipulation. In order to avoid these issues, I came up with a simple system: - Moderator inputs 25 pseudonyms into some online tool (e.g. animal names). - Each participant opens a secondary URL to the tool, which randomly assigns them one of the 25 pseudonyms. Every participant should receive a different pseudonym, such that all 25 ppl have one unique pseudonym which is unknown to the moderator (and to everyone else). - The Moderator hence knows all 25 pseudonyms, however he/she does not know, who has been assigned to which pseudonym. - When filling out the poll, every participant gives their pseudonym. That way, double-votes can be excluded and votes from pseudonyms not in the list can be eliminated when counting. Now, while such a tool sounds simple in principle, I cannot find such thing out there... - Let a moderator give it a list of pseudonyms via some admin-interface - print one of the 25 names, when opening a second URL. This should consider, that some names may be taken by others already. Does anyone here know of such tool OR has a better idea to organize an anonymous online vote/poll? Thank you very much in advance! Kind regards, Jan -- Jan Weymeirsch (former intern) passionate european & FOSS enthusiast Encrypt your mail! http://jan.weymeirs.ch/gpg

4 7

sandstorm.io easier hosting of Free Software collaboration tools?
by Bernhard E. Reiter 31 Mar '20

31 Mar '20

Hello, just discovered https://sandstorm.io/ Self description: Sandstorm is an open source project built by a community of volunteers with the goal of making it really easy to run open source web applications -- either on your own private server, or on our community-run servers. Does anybody has experienes with it? How helpful is it? What are the alternatives? Should we promote it more? Best, Bernhard -- FSFE -- Founding Member Support our work for Free Software: blogs.fsfe.org/bernhard https://fsfe.org/donate | contribute

1 0

Voting and Free Software
by Matthias Kirschner 26 Mar '20

26 Mar '20

There is an interesting article on LWN about Free Software and voting: https://lwn.net/Articles/797557/ Several commenters argued that electronic voting itself should not be done. E.g. one of the first commenters (Roberto) wrote that: It is indeed pretty sad to see that in 2019 we still need to explain, again and again, why electronic voting is not feasible. I have been involved in public debate about electronic voting since the early 2000, when it was unfortunately introduced in France. Here is a recent summary of the key points, in English, that should make a nice reading. http://www.dicosmo.org/MyOpinions/index.php?post/2016/02/25/A-rule-of-thumb… Do you agree with this criticism or what do you think about that topic? Best regards, Matthias PS: Btw. there was also a good episode of John Oliver explaining this to a broader audience: $youtube-dl https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=svEuG_ekNT0 -- Matthias Kirschner - President - Free Software Foundation Europe Schönhauser Allee 6/7, 10119 Berlin, Germany | t +49-30-27595290 Registered at Amtsgericht Hamburg, VR 17030 |(fsfe.org/support) Contact (fsfe.org/about/kirschner) Weblog k7r.eu/blog.html

12 20

Request for translation help: Fevermap / GPLv3 mobile app to track the pandemic
by Otto Kekäläinen 24 Mar '20

24 Mar '20

Hello! I need to find people who know how to use git and speak German, Russian or Spanish, so I remembered I might have some friends here :) Would somebody like to help out and translate a new app I have been working on? The UI is very simple and it takes just 15 minutes to translate it. It is GPLv3 and source code available at https://gitlab.com/fevermap/fevermap To translate it copy, simply copy the en.json from https://gitlab.com/fevermap/fevermap/-/blob/master/app/src/assets/language/, translate it, and send it to me in email or submit it on Gitlab as a merge request. Thank you! - Otto

4 4

"Awesome Free Software Site" www.afs.one
by Bernhard E. Reiter 24 Mar '20

24 Mar '20

Hi, recently discovered https://www.afs.one/ | Free Software Publisher Directory | Awesome Free Software One of the contributors is Jean-Paul Smets, well known last decade for helping to resist software patents. The idea is to find products and companies that actually make and maintain Free Software product with some info about them. What do you think of the approach and the site? Bernhard -- FSFE -- Founding Member Support our work for Free Software: blogs.fsfe.org/bernhard https://fsfe.org/donate | contribute

3 2

Experiences with BigBlueButton or CodeMD?
by Bernhard E. Reiter 23 Mar '20

23 Mar '20

Hi again, about remote working tools with Free Software, just recently saw * https://github.com/bigbluebutton/bigbluebutton (web conferencing system for online learning) * https://github.com/codimd/server (Realtime collaborative markdown notes on all platforms.) Does anybody has experiences with those tools? Regards, Bernhard -- FSFE -- Founding Member Support our work for Free Software: blogs.fsfe.org/bernhard https://fsfe.org/donate | contribute

2 2

List of payable jitsi hosters?
by Bernhard E. Reiter 21 Mar '20

21 Mar '20

Hello friends of Free Software, do you know a good list of jitsi hosters that people can just book accounts or a server for their organisation? Similiar to https://wiki.mumble.info/wiki/Hosters ? === already found the official way -> FAQ -> Where can I get commercial support? -> https://community.jitsi.org/c/users/paid-work Forum ist just a forum for asking. Could be browsed for answers. https://github.com/jitsi/jitsi-meet/wiki/Jitsi-Meet-Instances is a list of public instances, but no info about if they are offering payable accounts/servers? Search engines find a few offers, some companies offer individual services and some couple it with proprietary elements. It would be cool to have a list for ready-bookable offers. :) == Remote working with Free Software Given that more people are looking into remote working, there is a need for good Free Software solutions. Quite a few organisations already start to collect link lists, though it is not easy as just a list is not enough in many cases. (FSFE started something at https://wiki.fsfe.org/Activities/FreeSoftware4RemoteWorking but it needs more work.) Best Regards, Bernhard -- FSFE -- Founding Member Support our work for Free Software: blogs.fsfe.org/bernhard https://fsfe.org/donate | contribute

5 5

Collect old devices?
by Sascha Brawer 03 Mar '20

03 Mar '20

Does the FSFE accept donations of old devices, to be used as test hardware for projects such as Replicant, OpenWrt, Plasma Mobile, postmarketOS, etc.? Just a thought... perhaps the FSFE could collect devices and forward them to developers who’d use them for development/testing? — Sascha

2 1

Going beyond advocacy
by Paul Boddie 13 Feb '20

13 Feb '20

Hello, Last summer, there was a discussion on this list about "Strategy and serendipity" to which I contributed the following remarks: > Maybe the role of the FSFE is to go beyond advocacy and help knock some > stubborn heads together, to eliminate people's parochial and needlessly > competitive attitudes, to actually persuade people to commit to realising an > actual vision in a genuinely serious way, perhaps to secure resources to > allow this to happen. Urging people to use Free Software products that > don't exist just won't do the job. Recently, in the "suggestions/request for fsfe" discussion, it was pointed out that people want to use Free Software solutions but have no clear course of action they can take. And more recently still, I encountered another kind of situation that perhaps highlights the deficiencies of merely advocating for something without anything being organised to make that advocacy meaningful. As luck would have it, it has something to do with arguably one of the more successful and engaging campaigns that the FSFE has run: the PDFreaders campaign [1] requesting that public institutions cease advertising proprietary PDF-reading software (particularly that of a single vendor), emphasise the standardised nature of the PDF format, and acknowledge the existence of Free Software solutions. (One can imagine taking elements of such a campaign in other directions. For instance, public broadcasters like the BBC systematically promote proprietary social networking platforms whose harmful social effects go far beyond those caused by the promotion of proprietary PDF reader applications. Just as one might wonder whether Adobe had somehow procured favours from public institutions, so might we wonder what bargains have been made between taxpayer-funded media organisations and multi-billion-dollar corporations.) But it is the aspect of promoting Free Software solutions in a campaign that becomes troublesome, particularly if those solutions do not manage to address end-user needs. It was precisely this problem that I encountered recently. Having been sent a PDF form that needed completing, I rediscovered the apparent lack of support in Free Software applications for performing this task. Now, I may have mentioned this before in another context, that being a discussion about an alternative microkernel-based foundation for GNU Hurd, which I think most people would agree is quite a different area from PDF application software. But ignoring the rather out-of-place nature of the encouragement from an influential figure of the Free Software movement [2], a need for improved PDF document handling in Free Software is clearly recognised. Yet the situation is still confused and rather unsatisfactory: https://askubuntu.com/questions/29230/is-there-software-that-can-fill-pdf-f… While there may have been other factors involved in my own recent experiences, such as whether such documents would even be communicated securely, I ended up with the feeling that it would not be possible to perform an important task using Free Software. No amount of advocacy would remedy this situation. I imagine that some people would rather let "the market" figure out how Free Software products can be improved, that people motivated by a "business case" would see to it that such improvements are made. Unfortunately, the accompanying "business model" usually ends up taking the software proprietary, pursuing dubious monetisation strategies, or looking after niche groups of customers. What really needs to happen is that a coherent vision be articulated and then all necessary action pursued to realise it. If people are supposed to be able to use Free Software for their needs - interacting with PDF documents, in this particular case - then organisations must go beyond advocacy and actually facilitate the development of the features that are part of that vision. That may well involve the financing or sponsorship of developers, rather than "inspiring volunteers" or whatever the mantra - ostensibly empowering creativity, actually perpetuating exploitation - tends to be. So, while the PDFreaders campaign was helpful in raising awareness of Free Software and competition issues, as well as having useful side-effects in terms of liberating some PDF handling software, it also needed to be accompanied by initiatives to sustain Free PDF software development. Without such accompanying initiatives, we find ourselves confronting the same situations over and over again, always on the defensive and never really having something compelling to offer to those willing to try something new (or, for that matter, those of us who have supported Free Software all along). Well, that was probably far too many words stating the obvious, but I suppose the message will eventually sink in. Paul [1] https://fsfe.org/campaigns/pdfreaders/pdfreaders.en.html [2] https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/l4-hurd/2018-05/msg00001.html

4 7

Podcast about mobile phone communication with Harald Welte
by Matthias Kirschner 11 Feb '20

11 Feb '20

Hello all, In this third episode of our software freedom podcast we speak with our guest is Harald Welte about mobile phone communication and the general status of Free Software in this area: https://fsfe.org/news/podcast/episode-3.en.html Best regards, Matthias -- Matthias Kirschner - President - Free Software Foundation Europe Schönhauser Allee 6/7, 10119 Berlin, Germany | t +49-30-27595290 Registered at Amtsgericht Hamburg, VR 17030 |(fsfe.org/support) Contact (fsfe.org/about/kirschner) Weblog k7r.eu/blog.html

2 2

Jump to page:

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

2000

Discussion